WebFIRST DIVISION G.R. No. 57757, August 31, 1987 PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, PETITIONER, VS. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, PRAGMACIO VITUG AND MAXIMO VITUG, RESPONDENTS. D E C I S I O N GANCAYCO, J.: Does the presumption of conjugality of properties acquired by the spouses during coverture provided for in Article 160 of the … WebCase Digest: PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. OFFICE OF PRESIDENT Digest not created You do not seem to have any annotations for this case. Creating your own digest is easy. …
Case Digest: PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. TERESITA CRUZ
Web35 minutes ago · As per the new rules, the autonomous status will be granted initially for a period of 10 years provided the college is accredited either by the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) with a minimum 'A' Grade and a score of 3.01 and above, or by the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) for at least three programmes with a minimum … WebAug 21, 2024 · 197 SCRA 1 PNB vs. Pineda G.R. No. L-46658, 13 May 1991 FACTS: In 1963, the Arroyo Spouses, obtained a loan of P580,000.00 from petitioner bank to purchase 60% of the subscribed capital stock and thereby acquire the controlling interest of private respondent Tayabas Cement Company, Inc. (TCC). As security for said loan, the spouses … how to change line spacing in sharepoint
G.R. No. 228354 - CONCORDE CONDOMINIUM, INC., PETITIONER, VS …
WebPNB is considered an innocent assignee of the foreclosed property. PPI's acts deprived CCI of ownership over the parcels of land and disregarded CCI's rights as condominium unit buyers. Thus, it is held solely liable to CCI for damages. The fallo of the HLURB-NCRFO's original decision reads: WebSpouses Mirasol v PNB - Case Digest (Judicial Review) no. 128448 february 2001 spouses alejandro mlrasol and lilia mirasol, petitioners, vs. the court of Skip to document Ask an Expert Sign inRegister Sign inRegister Home Ask an ExpertNew My Library Discovery Institutions Our Lady of Fatima University Bataan Peninsula State University WebG.R. No. 103507 February 17, 1997. HON. SANDIGANBAYAN (First Division), and THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, represented by the OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, respondents. Through their separate petitions for review, 1 Luis A. Tabuena and Adolfo M. Peralta (Tabuena and Peralta, for short) appeal the Sandiganbayan decision dated … michael kors pink purse with flowers