site stats

Joseph shine vs union of india indian kanoon

Nettet3. jul. 2024 · The Supreme Court of India has struck down the Victorian Morality Law which is as old as 158 years, on Adultery, in a recent judgment given by it in the case of Joseph Shine v. Union of India. There have been numerous debates on the provisions of law related to Adultery. Nettet26. mar. 2024 · In India, Adultery law is defined in section 497 of Indian Penal Code. Section 497 comes under the purview of the courts several times in the past but every...

This too is a right: the right to sexual privacy - The Hindu

NettetVikram Aditya Singh And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 11 October, 2006. Punarjani Charitable Trust vs State Of Kerala on 12 February, 2024. ... 1954 which applies to Indian citizens irrespective of religion each marriage is registered by the Marriage Officer specially appointed for the purpose. Nettet3. jul. 2024 · The Supreme Court of India has struck down the Victorian Morality Law which is as old as 158 years, on Adultery, in a recent judgment given by it in the case of Joseph Shine v. Union of India [1]. There have been numerous debates on the provisions of law related to Adultery. The major bone of contention is that the language … otlc8-1000b https://eurekaferramenta.com

Case Analysis: Joseph Shine v. Union of India - Indian Law Portal

Nettet31. jan. 2024 · It is pointed out that the law was enacted to provide for an exhaustive Code. It is a complete Code. It provides for self-regulation. According to her, the decision of this Court in Joseph Shine (supra) must be viewed in the context of the institution of fMA No. 2204/2024 in W.P. (Crl.) NettetJoseph Shine vs Union of India case, Decriminalisation of Adultery - Rajasthan Judicial Service Exam StudyIQ IAS 14M subscribers Subscribe 1.4K Share Save 38K views 1 year ago Enrol to... Nettet28. des. 2024 · Author- Sarthak Gupta . Introduction. On 23 August 2024, the High Court of Chhattisgarh delivered its judgement in Dilip Pandey v. State of Chhattisgarh where the Court observed that ‘any sexual intercourse or sexual act by a husband, the wife not being under eighteen years of age, is not rape.’ The judgement has initiated the discourse on … otlc investorshub

Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2024) - Decriminalizing Adultery …

Category:2024, Joseph Shine Vs. Union of India: The assault over ... - YouTube

Tags:Joseph shine vs union of india indian kanoon

Joseph shine vs union of india indian kanoon

Indian Kanoon

Nettet17. feb. 2024 · Adultery - Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2024) 3 SCC 39 - It is not as if this Court approved of adultery. This Court has found that adultery may be a moral wrong (per Hon’ble Ms.... NettetIndian Kanoon

Joseph shine vs union of india indian kanoon

Did you know?

NettetIndia. Law(s) Article 14, Article 21. Bench Strength. 3 Judges. Case Type/Origin. Civil Appeal. Case Status. Overruled. Number of Opinion(s) 1. Case Citation. AIR 2008 SC 582, (2008) 1 SCC 234. Aspect(s) of privacy. Autonomy Surveillance Surveillance. Most Viewed. Read more... Supported by. About the project; Jurisdiction; Nettet24. des. 2024 · Case Description. Section 377 of the IPC categorised consensual sexual intercourse between same sex people as an “unnatural offence” which is “against the order of nature”. It prescribed a punishment of 10 years imprisonment. The provision is a Victorian-era law, which survived into the 21st century.

NettetJoseph Shine v. Union of India (2024) – Decriminalizing Adultery in India. Premium Content! You need General Studies (GS) subscription to access this content. Join now to unlock premium content. JOIN NOW. This article is part of the series “Landmark Judgements that Shaped India” under the Indian Polity Notes & Prelims Sureshots. Nettet8. mar. 2024 · In the Supreme Court of India Criminal Original Jurisdiction Case No. Writ petition (criminal) no. 194 of 2024 Petitioner Joseph Shine Respondent Union of India Date of Judgement Decided on July 27 th, 2024 Bench Deepak Misra, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Justice D.Y Chandrachud, Justice Indu Malhotra, and Justice R.F. Nariman.

NettetBoth Shabnam and Salim (hereinafter referred to as, “the convicts”) were co-accused in a murder case, that was tried against them on the allegations that they had committed murders of seven persons who were the members of Shabnam's family during the intervening night of 14th and 15th April, 2008. NettetJoseph Shine was an Italy based business man, who is a non-resident Indian from the State of Kerala filed a Public interest litigation before the Supreme Court of India challenging the constitutional validity of section 497 of Indian Penal Code,1860 and section 198 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code,1973. The prime reason for challenging the ...

Nettet13. sep. 2024 · ADULTERY WAS ABOLISH ON 27 SEPTEMBER, 2024 BY THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT The name of the judgement was : “ Joseph Shine V Union of India. As it violates Article 14 and 21 of the constitution of India. Facebook Twitter Email Share Previous Post Next Post kanoonsangrah known your kanoon -1 …

Nettet21. feb. 2024 · Therefore, the same offends Article 21, Joseph Shine v. Union of India, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1676. Violation of right to privacy and right to choose This Court has recognised sexual privacy as a natural right, protected under the Constitution. Sharing of physical intimacies is a reflection of choice. otlc yahoo financeNettetJoseph Shine vs Union Of India on 27 September, 2024. Share Link. Mobile View. Premium MembersAdvanced SearchCase Removal. View Complete document. Joseph Shine vs Union Of India on 27 September, 2024. Showing the contexts in which joseph shineappears in the document. otlc8-2000cotl campus anmeldung