WebIn Gihwala v Grancy Property Limited [2016] ZASCA 35 the Supreme Court of Appeal was faced with some important questions surrounding the declaration of delinquency of a … http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2014/97.html

MRL2601 GIHWALA v GRANCY case summary.pdf - Course Hero

WebJun 4, 2024 · In a judgment delivered by Judge Tolmay on 27 May 2024 in Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse and Another v Myeni and Others (case number 15996/2024), the … WebAug 8, 2024 · In Gihwala and others v Grancy property Ltd and Others 2024 (2) SA 337 (SCA), the directors tried to attack the constitutionality of Section 162(5)(c) on the grounds that it infringed on Section 22 of the Constitution because, they argued, it limited their constitutional right to choose their trade, occupation or profession freely. This did not ... find attached hard drive

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr - Delinquent Directors

WebDisputes arose when Mr Gihwala and Mr Manala refused to recognise that Grancy was entitled to a shareholding in SMI or any information about its business or how its money had been invested. This has led to extensive litigation both in the Western Cape Division of the High Court and in the SCA. WebIn Gihwala and others v Grancy Property Limited and Others[3], Wallace JA (Louis JA, Leach JA, Seriti JA and Tsoka AJA concurring) held that the directors in question were delinquent, having, inter alia, (i) used the company to provide themselves with financial benefits to the prejudice of the company’s only other shareholder; (ii) breached an WebDelinquent directors under the Companies Act 71 of 2008: Gihwala v Grancy Property Limited 2016 ZASCA 35 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal (PELJ) On-line version ISSN 1727-3781 Abstract CASSIM, R. Delinquent directors under the Companies Act 71 of 2008: Gihwala v Grancy Property Limited 2016 ZASCA 35. PER [online]. 2016, vol.19, … gtech atf switch